Flip Flop Flying

Iran

with 3 comments

Aside from being quite scary sometimes when he opens his mouth, Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is, I think, the most handsome world leader out there. The Afghan fella might dress the best with his cute lil’ hat, but there’s something quite charming about Ahmadinejad’s cheap-looking suits and open collar that I really like. And he’s got those dark eyes that light up when he’s smiling. Plus he’s got a beard, which is always a plus in my book.

I was listening to something on Democracy Now! yesterday which was very interesting. They had an interview with this chap who used to be a UN weapons inspector called Scott Ritter about his new book, “Target Iran: The Truth About the White House’s Plans for Regime Change.” While Ahmadinejad is making it easy for the media to aid Bush’s plans to go in there and bomb the shit out of Iran, they’re ignoring one very important fact: that the big power dude in Iran isn’t really Ahmadinejad; it’s the Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Khamenei. This is what Ritter said:

[Khamenei] is supported by an organization called the Guardian Council. Then there’s another group called the Expediency Council. These are the people that control the military, the police, the nuclear program, all the instruments of power. And not only has the Supreme Leader issued a fatwa that says that nuclear weapons are not compatible with Islamic law, with the Shia belief system that he is responsible, in 2003 he actually reached out to the Bush administration via the Swiss embassy and said, “Look, we would like to normalize relations with the United States. We’d like to initiate a process that leads to a peace treaty between Israel and Iran.” Get this, Israel and Iran. He’s not saying, “We want to wipe Israel off the face of the earth.” He is saying, “We want peace with Israel.” And they were willing to put their nuclear program on the table.
Why didn’t the Bush administration embrace this? Because that leads to a process of normalization, where the United States recognizes the legitimacy of the theocracy and is willing to peacefully coexist with the theocracy. That’s not the Bush administration’s position.

That’s an interesting thing that I didn’t know before. Anyway, here’s an mp3 link to the interview.

Written by Craig

October 18th, 2006 at 2:53 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

3 Responses to 'Iran'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'Iran'.

  1. Welcome to the wonderful world of the US governments policy. It’s not exactly sophisticated – like the time in 2005 they told opposition parties to boycott the Venezualan election, so they could accuse Chavez of not having free elections. The list goes on, I guess Iran is just the next hit they’re going to make.

    Anonymous

    18 Oct 06 at 6:48 pm

  2. Apparently, in Iran they call his suit
    the “Ahmadinerjacket”. S’true.

    Okapi

    19 Oct 06 at 2:45 pm

  3. well that makes me feel a whole lot safer :-(

    Funnily enough I had dinner last night with the guy who was in charge of setting up the Kurdish safe havens after the first Gulf War. He said the biggest mistake the US made this time was letting the army disband – they were nearly all anti Saddam anyway and ould have been used to police Iraq. Instead they let them all go home WITH THEIR GUNS to work for whichever local hoodlum took their fancy.

    dave

    19 Oct 06 at 3:36 pm

Leave a Reply